He said recognizing marriage as only between one man and one woman is “absolutely not” discriminatory in terms of constitutional law. He cited Justice Anthony Kennedy’s ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, a landmark 2003 case that declared laws against homosexual acts to be unconstitutional. That ruling, George said, has “no implications whatsoever for marriage.”
George is a Princeton University professor of jurisprudence and co-author of the “Manhattan Declaration,” a 2009 statement in defense of the sanctity of life and the family that has garnered nearly 500,000 signatures.
He said even prior to the administration’s latest decision, the Justice Department has mounted only half-hearted efforts to defend the marriage law in court.
“In the litigation so far, the Obama administration and Attorney General Eric Holder have defended the law so inadequately as to make it nearly impossible to conclude that they were not throwing the case,” George said Feb. 24, one day after the administration announced that it would no longer defend the law.
Holder and the Justice Department have declined to advance the “very best arguments” in support of the law. Instead, he said, the administration seemed intent on “deliberately sabotaging the case.”
The law says that the federal government only recognizes unions of one man and one woman as “marriages,” and will not provide benefits to same-sex couples in civil partnerships. It also established that U.S. states are not obliged to recognize same-sex “marriages” contracted in other states that recognize those unions.
But even if the administration will no longer defend the law, George said that Congress can.
“Members of the House of Representatives have standing to retain their own counsel and to defend the act, which, after all, went through the Congress with large bipartisan majorities,” George said. “I’m confident that the lawyers defending the act for the members of the House will defend it robustly and will make the very best possible arguments. In the end, I think, they will succeed in demonstrating that the act is perfectly constitutionally valid.”
George also raised the question of whether President Barack Obama had “defaulted” on his obligation faithfully to see that that the laws of the nation are executed, as his presidential oath requires.
However, George believes public sentiment for traditional marriage remains strong. He noted that all 31 state initiatives to reaffirm the definition of marriage have passed in recent years
For George, these defeats for advocates of same-sex “marriage” explain why they are trying to prevent the issue from being decided in an election.
(Story continues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
“If they really thought that the people were going their way… they would be out there ahead of us trying to get the issue on the ballot.”
While some proponents of same-sex “marriage” have depicted their victory as inevitable, George noted the same had been said of movements like communism and legal abortion. However, in the case of abortion most people now profess themselves to be pro-life, especially young people.
“The people on the pro-same-sex marriage side can crow all they want and bluster about how history is on their side, but I’ve heard that same song before,” he said.