Barbagallo did not reveal who would be the new person at the supervision unit. But the upcoming appointment could be significant.
If the new director comes from an Italian institution, it would confirm a growing Vatican trend.
This trend emerged early in the Vatican financial watchdog’s journey. Francesco De Pasquale, first AIF director and then president, came from the Bank of Italy. The board members were all Italians and, except for Giuseppe Dalla Torre, all came from the Bank of Italy milieu.
The Vatican’s anti-money laundering law was then reformed, and the AIF took on a more international aspect. The director and then president was René Brülhart, a top expert on money-laundering issues, while the board included only one Italian, Maria Bianca Farina, a manager from Poste Italiane, the Italian postal service.
Pope Francis recently restored the Italian-Holy See connection, after the so-called Sloane Avenue scandal: the controversial Secretariat of State investment on a luxury real estate in London.
The scandal came while both the mandates of the AIF president and director were expiring. Brülhart was not confirmed as AIF president, and Carmelo Barbagallo, coming from the Bank of Italy, was called to replace him. The director Tommaso Di Ruzza was not renewed either and was replaced by Giuseppe Schlitzer, who also collaborated with the Bank of Italy in the past.
It is also noteworthy that Diana Rocco comes from the Bank of Italy’s financial intelligence unit.
Other Vatican appointments confirmed the trend. The president of the Vatican Tribunal is Giuseppe Pignatone, a retired Italian public prosecutor. The Vatican’s prosecutors are all Italian, and either currently work or previously worked for legal firms in Italy. Saverio Capolupo, the former commander general of Italy’s financial police force, is now president of the Monti Foundation, which manages the disgraced IDI hospital.
Beyond this piece of news, Barbagallo’s interview with Vatican media has some other interesting points.
He stressed that the Holy See made a “significant” choice to join the Egmont Group, “a global forum of the Financial Intelligence Units of over 160 countries, that share good practices for the international cooperation and the exchange of financial intelligence information.”
During the in-flight press conference coming back from Japan in 2019, Pope Francis stressed that Egmont Group is “a private group.” At that time, the Egmont Group had unplugged the Vatican Financial Intelligence Authority from its secure network to exchange information. The reason was that during the Sloane Avenue investigation, Vatican police had seized some financial intelligence documents in the Vatican financial watchdog offices, thus jeopardizing the institution’s autonomy.
Egmont re-admitted the Authority into its secure network only when the AIF and the Vatican tribunal signed a memorandum of understanding about the documents’ use.
(Story cotinues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
In the interview, Barbagallo also praised how the Vatican anti-money laundering system has been perfected over time. He especially underscored the 2013 anti-money laundering law, followed by the AIF’s new statutes in 2014.
He said that the monitoring system had been increasingly strengthened, noting that there had been several memoranda of understanding between the AIF and its counterparts all over the world.
After praising the past, Barbagallo observed that under his presidency the AIF’s statutes were amended. The AIF changed its name to ASIF, thus “rationalizing and strengthening its governance.”
The change of name had been discussed already in 2012 when Cardinal Attilio Nicora was the Authority’s president. Nicora finally decided to keep the name as changing it might have created some confusion.
Also, the amended statutes enhanced the ASIF president’s power, in a sort of “return to the past.”
In the 2014 AIF statutes, the Authority’s president was designed as a guarantor, while the director was in charge of operational matters and the board outlined the general strategies. The new statutes seem to limit the director’s powers, while the board has taken on a more executive role. This might prompt some issues for an eventual conflict of interest, since the board members also work for other institutions.