A June 24 ABC News video about Catholic alternatives to abortion has the tag, as do news videos about President Joe Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and the conflict between their professed Catholicism and their strong support for legal abortion.
An October 2021 Reuters video, “Biden meets Pope, as abortion debate flares,” includes the notice.
Some news videos on pro-abortion vandalism of Catholic churches and pro-life pregnancy centers now present the panel with abortion information.
CNA sought comment from YouTube but did not receive a response prior to publication. YouTube announced the information panel on July 21, saying that it will remove “content that provides instructions for unsafe abortion methods or promotes false claims about abortion safety.”
A YouTube help page said that these information panels will be shown “regardless of what opinions or perspectives are expressed in a video.” It says the information panel may appear for those who “search or watch videos related to topics prone to misinformation.” The page describes the panels as background information from “independent, third-party partners, to give more context on a topic.”
Morell, however, objected that federal law does not envision internet platforms acting in this capacity.
“In this instance, YouTube is very much acting as an editor or publisher,” she said.
Morell cited Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. The communications law limits internet sites’ legal liabilities for decisions related to their users’ content.
Companies have “broad-sweeping immunity from publisher liability even for these traditional publisher functions,” she said. This means pro-life groups cannot sue them for adding the disclaimers.
“Pro-life groups are left without legal recourse for contesting this editorial interference by YouTube. If YouTube wants to add information to content, then it shouldn’t get to have legal immunity for those edits,” Morrell said.
Backers of abortion have at times accused pro-life advocates of promoting misinformation and have called for political and corporate leaders to take action against them.
(Story continues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
In June the New York attorney general’s office sent Google a letter requesting that the company remove pro-life pregnancy centers from search results for “abortion services.” The letter was critical of efforts to dissuade pregnant women from seeking abortions and said it was “dangerous and misleading” to list both abortion providers and non-abortion providers in search results.
In 2014, Google began removing some paid ads for pro-life pregnancy centers after the abortion advocacy group NARAL Pro-Choice America complained that the ads were deceptive, a charge that pregnancy centers rejected.
Google has blocked all ads promoting abortion pill reversal, a progesterone regimen for women who take the drug Mifepristone.
Progesterone, a pregnancy-related hormone, is approved to prevent miscarriage. The American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists defended the practice in a Nov. 16, 2019, medical practice bulletin.
“The current research suggests that using progesterone to counter the effects of mifepristone and stop the abortion process is both safe and effective,” the bulletin says. “Since there is no alternative treatment for women who change their minds, it is reasonable to offer this life-saving and life-changing treatment to women who desire to increase the chances of pregnancy survival.”
The pro-abortion American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, claims that the use of progesterone to reverse the drug mifepristone is not supported by science and its use does not meet clinical standards.