“So the Xmas abbreviation would just shorten the name of Christ through the first letter of Christ in Greek, pretty much as in the chrismon,” he said.
The earliest known usage of this abbreviation is found in an 11th-century portion of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, in which the unknown writer referred to “Xp̄es mæsse uhtan,” or “the morning of Christmas.” Another example can be found in a letter by King Edward VI, who in the 1500s referred to “X’temmas next following.”
In the late 1700s, meanwhile, the poet Samual Taylor Coleridge referred to his Christmas poem as “my Xstmas Carol” (the great poet modestly referred to the verse as a “quaint performance”).
Coleridge a few years later similarly referred to “Xmas day,” proving that, whatever the suffixal variants of the term, the “X” consistently acted as a stand-in for “Christ.”
The written usage of “Xmas” in earlier centuries was likely motivated at least in part by practical concerns: Ink and paper were both expensive, and shortcuts could help save and stretch those precious resources.
The “Xmas” convention, of course, has survived to the present day, though not without controversy, as many still believe it is an attempt to scrub Christ himself out of the holiday. Thankfully, the opposite is true.
So feel free to wish your loved ones a “Happy Xmas” this year, knowing that the greeting itself contains Christ, whose birth we rightly celebrate this month for the miracle it is.
Daniel Payne is a senior editor at Catholic News Agency. He previously worked at the College Fix and Just the News. He lives in Virginia with his family.