However, insurers were not specifically instructed to deny or discourage all charities from helping pay medical bills, Volk explained.
Rather, for health plans on the state exchanges, the administration “discouraged” insurers from accepting third-party payments by patient advocacy groups which focused on people with specific health conditions.
These are groups like the Muscular Sclerosis Society and the National Hemophilia Foundation, which provide financial assistance for patients with chronic conditions to pay their monthly premiums, she said.
The reasoning behind this rule was because helping only those with serious medical conditions enroll in the insurance marketplaces could skew enrollment toward high-risk patients, where fewer healthy enrollees would be subsidizing more enrollees with chronic health conditions, Volk explained.
In 2013, the CMS published a Q & A about this topic. “[The Department of Health and Human Services] has significant concerns” about third-party payments, it said, “because it could skew the insurance risk pool and create an unlevel field in the Marketplaces.”
Basically, the statement was to “discourage insurers taking payments from charitable organizations that target their assistance based on health diagnosis,” Volk explained.
Then in February of 2014, CMS followed up with a clarification. Charities and churches were allowed to offer premium assistance, as long as they did so based on income need and not health condition – “based on financial status and do not consider enrollees’ health status,” as CMS stated.
In April of 2014, the Catholic Health Association and American Hospital Association wrote then-Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius and asked her for a statement confirming that the administration was “not discouraging hospital-affiliated or other charitable foundations from subsidizing premiums” on the exchanges, or helping with “cost-sharing expenses for needy enrollees.”
In her response, Sebelius reaffirmed CMS’ statement that charities were allowed to help with premium payments as long the assistance was income- and not condition-based.
However, although any stories of church assistance being refused by insurance companies are “anecdotal right now,” insurers are sending letters stating that they are not accepting third-party payments by non-profit organizations, Dana Kuhn, founder and president of the patient advocacy group Patient Services, Inc. told CNA.
60 plans in 38 states “are returning checks from non-profit organizations, once they find out they’re a non-profit organization that is paying a premium on behalf of a person with a chronic condition,” he said.
The fact that the prohibitions stand for “third parties,” without specifying that income-based assistance by charities and churches will be accepted, is troubling, he said.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
For instance, a March, 2014 letter from BlueCross BlueShield of Louisiana stated that they were “not accepting premium payments from any third parties who are not related (by blood or marriage) to the subscriber.”
UnitedHealthcare of North Carolina told members in a coverage packet that they could not “accept any direct or indirect contribution or reimbursement by or on behalf of any third party.” The only exempt parties were, again, those exempted by CMS. Churches and charities were not specifically mentioned.
A November, 2014 letter From BlueCrossBlueShield South Carolina stated that CMS “has encouraged insurance companies offering plans through the Federally Facilitated Marketplace to reject premium payments made by third parties on behalf of members in certain circumstances.”
Regardless of churches and other charities, patient advocacy groups”like Patient Services, Inc. that help people with specific chronic conditions say their payments should be accepted anyhow. They are now pushing for the passage of the bill in Congress to have insurers accept their premium payments.
Medical costs for people with chronic health conditions can be high, and despite the health care law capping out-of-pocket medical expenses, some situations still may require financial assistance.
According to the National Hemophilia Foundation, someone suffering from severe hemophilia could incur up to $300,000 a year in treatment costs. Someone waiting for a kidney transplant – currently more than 100,000 Americans – will need expensive weekly treatments just to survive, according to the American Kidney Association.