The amended version of the bill will now go to the House of Representatives, where an earlier version passed. Kemp has said that he will sign the bill into law.
The signatories, who include Alec Baldwin, Don Cheadle, Rosie O’Donnell, Gabrielle Union, and Sean Penn, said that if this “dangerous and deeply-flawed bill” were to become law, they would do “everything in our power to move our industry to a safer state for women.”
“We can’t imagine being elected officials who had to say to their constituents ‘I enacted a law that was so evil, it chased billions of dollars out of our state’s economy,’” says the letter.
In 2016, Georgia eclipsed all other states, including California, to become the state for the production of feature films, due in large part to the state’s generous tax initiatives for production companies.
Many Marvel Cinematic Universe films were shot in Georgia, including the upcoming Avengers: Endgame, as well as Academy Award-nominated Black Panther.
This is not the first time the entertainment industry has threatened a boycott of Georgia to achieve a policy goal. In 2016, Hollywood as well as other industries headquartered in Georgia threatened to leave the state if H.B. 757 were to become law.
That bill, which was vetoed by then-Gov. Nathan Deal (R), would have ensured religious officials would not be forced to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies.
A group of entertainment executives also threatened to boycott Georgia upon the election of Gov. Kemp in November. That boycott has thus far not come into fruition, and was discouraged by Stacey Abrams (D), who lost the election to Kemp.
“I appreciate the calls to action, but I ask all of our entertainment industry friends to support #FairFightGA - but please do not #boycottgeorgia,” said Abrams in a tweet.
“The hard-working Georgians who serve on crews & make a living here are not to blame. I promise: We will fight - and we will win.”
If H.B. 481 were signed into law, there is very little chance it would go into effect. Pro-abortion groups have launched a series legal challenges to this type of legislation immediately upon passage.
States that have passed similar legislation have seen their laws be declared unconstitutional. Due to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, abortion law cannot restrict access to abortion prior to the viability of the unborn child, as this bill would do.
(Story cotinues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
The legal uncertainty of these “heartbeat bills” has prompted pro-life leaders to refuse to support them, preferring instead to favor blanket ban laws which could come into effect were Roe v. Wade reversed.