Chatigny said that referring to the biologically male athletes as “males” is “not accurate” and “needlessly provocative.”
When an ADF attorney responded on the call that by referring to them as “males,” they were simply complying with human “physiology,” the judge said that terminology was “unfortunate.” If the attorneys persisted in doing so, he said, “maybe we’ll need to do something.”
National Review reported Monday that ADF attorneys filed a motion for Chatigyny to recuse himself on May 9, calling his order “legally unprecedented” and saying it showed his inability to hear the case with impartiality.
“A disinterested observer would reasonably believe that the Court’s order and comments have destroyed the appearance of impartiality in this proceeding. That requires recusal,” National Review reported the motion as arguing.
The three girls had initially filed a Title IX complaint with the Department of Education last summer, before filing another complaint in the federal district court in February.
Since the state’s new athletic policy was instituted in 2017, two males identifying as female have won 15 women’s state championship titles, and one of the two has set 10 state records previously held by 10 different girls.
Their Title IX complaint stated that “biological differences” between boys and girls “matter for fair competition,” and that federally-funded education activities cannot discriminate on basis of sex.
In March, Attorney General Bill Barr and several other Department of Justice officials co-signed a statement of interest in the case, saying that biological males who identify as women should not be classified as girls when it comes to athletics.
“The Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC), however, has adopted a policy that requires biological males to compete against biological females—despite the real physiological differences between the sexes—if the male is a transgender individual who publicly identifies with the female gender. CIAC claims that ‘federal law’ requires this state of affairs,” said the statement of interest in March.
“They are incorrect,” the Justice Department said. “One of Title IX’s core purposes is to ensure that women have an ‘equal athletic opportunity’ to participate in school athletic programs.”
“Schools realize that purpose primarily by establishing separate athletic teams for men and women and by ensuring that those teams are on equal footing,” wrote the DOJ.
“Because of the physiological differences between men and women, the existence of women’s sports teams permits women to participate more fully in athletics than they otherwise could.”
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.