In March 2018, Catholic Social Services of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia was informed that the city would no longer refer foster children to the agency for assistance because of its faith-based stance on same-sex marriage. The city then passed a resolution calling for an investigation into religiously-based foster care services, after a same-sex couple claimed they were discriminated against by a different faith-based agency.
Catholic Social Services is barred from making new placements unless it agrees to recommend same-sex couples for the adoption of children.
Before the relationship ended, the agency served about 120 foster children in 100 foster homes. In 2017, the charity says, it helped more than 2,200 children in the Philadelphia area. The city has worked with the agency for over 100 years.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said it joined the brief because the case “raises the important question whether churches and other religious organizations can continue to provide critical human services, as organized communities of religious adherents have done for centuries, without surrendering their religious beliefs.” The conflicts in the case are similar to those between Catholics and civil authorities elsewhere in the U.S.
For its part, the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference joined the brief because it believes all dioceses in the state have a common interest in the question of whether a Pennsylvania municipality “should impose a substantial burden on the exercise of a fundamental aspect of church ministry.”
Placing abused and neglected children with foster families is “still an important religious activity,” the brief said. It sided with Catholic Social Services’ testimony that its work with foster children is “an important religious ministry” and that Philadelphia’s efforts to block this work “burden its religious liberty.”
The brief objected to the Third Circuit court’s depiction of foster care as “essentially a public service.” It argued against claims that the Catholic agency is just another government contractor, and that facilitating foster care placements is just another public service activity that the agency is “free to undertake or not, as it chooses.”
The bishops’ amicus brief argued that the court should reject the claim that “foster care placements stopped being a religious exercise in Philadelphia when it became a city-managed ‘public service’.”
“This either-or, all-or-nothing approach is incompatible with this court’s religion clauses jurisprudence,” the brief continued. “It also flies in the face of common sense. It cannot be that an activity, traditionally undertaken by religious groups for religious reasons, loses all religious liberty protections as soon as government encompasses it within a regulatory framework.”
“In whatever sense foster care might today be a ‘public service,’ it cannot be the case that the government can so easily deprive the Catholic Church of the opportunity to continue a ministry that has been a core part of its identity for nearly 2,000 years,” said the brief.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled against Catholic Social Services in an April 22 ruling, saying that the city’s non-discrimination policy is “a neutral, generally applicable law.” Circuit Judge Thomas Ambro said “the religious views of CSS do not entitle it to an exception from that policy.” He said the city is “on firm ground” in requiring contractors to have non-discrimination policies and has shown “good faith” in enforcing these laws against discrimination rather than exhibiting an anti-religious bias.
In August 2018 the Supreme Court declined to grant an injunction that would require the city to continue its foster-care placement with the agency during litigation over the matter. Due to the coronavirus epidemic, the Supreme Court postponed oral arguments in the case. The postponement could cause continued harm to the agency, which is on a “wind-down” contract and has laid off employees. This is despite the presence of families who want to adopt children through the agency and work with it.
(Story cotinues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
The brief gave an overview of Catholic history and exhortations to care for orphans and children in need in Scripture and other Catholic teaching.
“(T)he Catholic Church has been helping orphans and other vulnerable children in Philadelphia for more than 200 years,” said the brief, adding “the Catholic Church’s commitment to this ministry flows from Scripture and Church teaching, from the early church fathers through Pope Francis.”
The early Christian practice of taking in children who had been put out for exposure under Roman customs was cited in the brief. Some of the Church’s greatest saints and religious orders were devoted to caring for orphans and children in need, it said. In American history, the Catholic Church, especially women religious, played an enormous role in serving orphans. The brief cited the examples of St. Elizabeth Ann Seton, St. Frances Cabrini, and Mother Joseph of the Sisters of Providence, and Father Edward Flanagan of Boys Town.
The plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case include Sharonell Fulton and Toni Simms-Busch. Fulton has fostered more than 40 children through the agency, while Simms-Busch adopted children she fostered through the agency. The plaintiffs said they chose to work with the agency because it matches their personal beliefs and values.
Becket, a law firm specializing in religious liberty cases, is representing the plaintiffs.
Becket said the Catholic agency has not been the subject of any discrimination complaints by same-sex couples. It had never been asked to certify or endorse a same-sex couple, and no couple had been turned away from fostering because of the agency’s beliefs.