"Abortion is an essential health service, and this law clearly violates the constitutional rights of patients and disproportionately harms communities of color," she said, according to the television station Fox 17 Nashville.
The ACLU of Tennessee attempted to counter bans on abortion "motivated by sex, race or disability diagnosis of the unborn child." These "reason bans," the group contended, are "peddling stigma around abortions and stereotypes of Black and Brown communities, Asian Americans, and people with disabilities."
Last month State Rep. Susan Lynn, a sponsor of the bill, told EWTN Pro-Life Weekly that Tennessee lawmakers anticipated a legal challenge to the bill, so they used a "ladder approach," of multiple limits, so if the court strikes down the heartbeat ban portion, the remaining bans will remain in place.
"There's a successive order of dates where the court can reach that level where they feel comfortable," Lynn said.
Lynn said she hoped the bill's heartbeat ban stands because "a heartbeat is an indicator of life."
"So it only makes sense that when there is a heartbeat, there cannot be an abortion," she said.
Under the law, a doctor must determine the gestational age of the unborn child and inform the mother, allow the woman to hear the fetal heartbeat and explain the location of the unborn child in her uterus, conduct an ultrasound and display the images to the mother. The abortionist must provide an explanation of the unborn child's size and explain which external body parts and internal organs are present and visible.
A heartbeat-based abortion ban passed the Tennessee House last year but Republican Lt. Gov. Randy McNally did not support it in the Senate.
Similar laws in Mississippi, Ohio, and other states have been struck down in court.
If the law takes effect, a doctor who performs an illegal abortion would face a Class C felony.
The bill drew support from pro-life advocates.
"This law recognizes the humanity of the unborn child by stopping abortion as soon as a heartbeat can be detected, protecting them from lethal discrimination in the womb, and ending late-term abortions after five months, when unborn babies can feel excruciating pain, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, said June 19.
She characterized the bill as a rejection of "abortion extremism" in states such as New York and Virginia, where legislators have "pushed to expand abortion on demand through birth and even infanticide."
(Story continues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
The law requires abortion clinics to post a sign saying that it is possible to reverse a chemical abortion, or face a $10,000 fine.
Similar Arizona legislation, passed in 2015, was repealed in 2016 after legal challenges. Arizona had to pay Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers more than $600,000 in attorney fees and other costs spent fighting the law, the Associated Press reported.
Due to the novel coronavirus epidemic, the bill was thought to be shelved. It appeared to have revived in last-minute negotiations between the House and Senate, The Tennessean reports. The Senate rules were suspended when the bill was passed and no members of the public were present.
The manner in which the bill was passed also drew criticism from its foes.