“We have an obligation to do what we can to protect our own health, as well as to do what we can to protect the health of others,” he said. “And those are good ethical reasons why one might choose to be vaccinated in this case.”
Naumann said there was a “moral justification” to receiving the vaccine, but that “not everyone has to make that decision.”
Those who do receive the vaccine, however, “are even more obligated” to urge pharmaceutical companies and the government to strive to produce ethical vaccines.
“With the Moderna and the Pfizer vaccine, there were no aborted fetal cell lines used in the production or the development. However, they did use aborted fetal cell lines in the testing to see if they were if they were effective,” explained Naumann. “The AstraZeneca one, on the other hand, does use these aborted fetal cell lines that go back to 1960 when the abortions actually occurred.”
Naumann said it was “important” to note that “these are very old cell lines,” and that “it’s not like new abortions are happening because of these vaccines.”
If a vaccine were to be released that was completely free of any connection to abortion, said Naumann, “certainly that would be our encouragement for Catholics to use those.”
“But if the only options are these (three vaccines), then we think that the Moderna and Pfizer are even more remote in their cooperation in an abortion than the AstraZenaca one.”
Despite the abortion connection, Naumann, echoing a recent decree from the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, stated the vaccinations are “licit and permissible,” though not obligatory.
Receiving the vaccine, the archbishop explained, would be considered to be “remote cooperation” with abortion.
“The person receiving the vaccine really had no influence on the decision on how that vaccine was tested or developed,” he said. “So in receiving the vaccine, they’re not giving approval to those decisions that were made by pharmaceutical companies, basically.”
Naumann said that he did not see the vaccines as “encouraging abortion,” adding that “it’s not like new abortions need to occur for these cell lines. These cell lines have been replicated for decades now.”
The cell line in question, HEK-293, was derived from an aborted female child in the Netherlands in the 1970s. Naumann said that he believed scientists were using this cell line “more out of convenience.”
(Story continues below)
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
At Catholic News Agency, our team is committed to reporting the truth with courage, integrity, and fidelity to our faith. We provide news about the Church and the world, as seen through the teachings of the Catholic Church. When you subscribe to the CNA UPDATE, we'll send you a daily email with links to the news you need and, occasionally, breaking news.
As part of this free service you may receive occasional offers from us at EWTN News and EWTN. We won't rent or sell your information, and you can unsubscribe at any time.
“This is why the bishops of the United States really early on in the COVID epidemic, we asked our government, ‘please make sure that there are ethical vaccines available for our people,’” said Naumann.